There Is No Such Thing As Negative Calorie Foods, Says New Study

There is an enduring myth that certain type of foods have “negative calories”, entailing you use up more calories eating and digesting them than the number of members of calories they actually contain. Many have argued against this notion, and now a new examine- albeit in lizards, and currently under review- has provided some important empirical evidence that negative calories are not a thing. That said, the research does have some good news.

Foods that are low in calories and high in water content and fibers, like celery, lettuce, grapefruit, cucumber, and broccoli are often purported to have “negative calories”. This is why they are often suggested in short term, sometimes worryingly extreme, weight-loss diets. For this new study, available to read on the biology pre-print site BioRxiv, the researchers looked at celery in particular, as it is the most quoth example of this alleged property.

Researchers from the University of Alabama fed an all-celery diet to an animal model, in this case, bearded dragons( more on this later ), and measured how many calories were lost to either digestion or excretion after each dinner. On average, the lizards retained a one-quarter of the calories devoured from each celery meal. One-third of the calories were required for digestion, 43 percentage were excreted in either feces or urate, and the remaining 24 percent was absorbed by the dragons. Thus calories were devoured, and celery is not calorie deficit.

Why bearded dragons? Use lizards might seem an unconventional selection, but they are naturally omnivorous, like us, and actually have a similar digestive system- the style they digest, assimilate and assimilate food- to humans. On top of that, they are docile and seem to like celery, which constructs them pretty good for this study.

While the study concluded that negative calories are not a thing, celery remains nutrient poor, which is the “good news” from the study. Despite still gaining calories from it, the amount is so small that it doesn’t cover the body’s metabolic budget, and you will eventually end up in “negative budget”, entailing eating these types of food could result in loss of body mass.

Although the study merely looked at celery and lizards, they used their findings to induce some hypothesis of determining whether other oft-cited negative calories foods exist, including watermelon, tomatoes, carrots, apples, and blueberries. They estimated that humans would retain between 19 and 50 percent of the calories from these foods, but that these foods are also negative budget.

Still, just to cover one’s basic metabolism( ignoring moving about ), an adult woman would have to eat 12.6 kilograms of raw celery, 9 kilograms of raw tomatoes, or 4.3 kilograms of raw carrots.

“Rather than labeling such foods as “negative calorie” it would be more accurate to pitch these foods as “negative budget”, the consumption of which will favor a daily negative energy budget, and hence weight loss via the catabolism of body fat.” the researchers write in the working papers, which has been submitted to the Journal of Experimental Biology.

[ H/ T: LiveScience]

Read more:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *