‘Outrageous’: expert slams White House for denying school meals’ link to learning

Author of groundbreaking study of school snacks impact on class accomplishment said proposed cuts to programs reflects lack of knowledge or dishonesty

The author of a groundbreaking 1988 study demonstrating the link between school meal programs and classroom accomplishment has denounced as outrageous the Trump administrations assertion that no such link exists.

When Mick Mulvaney, director of Donald Trumps office of budget management, told press on Thursday that the administrations attack on school meal programs because they dont work, he did not mean that they dont feed hungry children.

Lets talk about after-school programs generally: theyre supposed to help kids who dont get fed at home get fed so they do better in school. Guess what? Theres no demonstrable evidence that theyre actually doing that, Mulvaney said. Theres no demonstrable evidence theyre actually helping outcomes, helping kids do better in school.

That statement is an outrageous, fallacious remark that clearly reflects a lack of knowledge, or perhaps even worse, deceit, said physician Michael Weitzman in an interview with the Guardian. Weitzman is the former chair of pediatrics at New York University, where he currently teaches, and this years recipient of the John Howland award, the highest honor bestowed by the American Pediatric Society.

Weitzman is also an writer of the 1988 study of Boston schoolchildren that demonstrated a causal relationship between academic performance and expanded school breakfast programs for the first time. When the study was released, Weitzman argued, and still argues, that the cost to the public of school snacks is a pittance compared with the benefit to society. The findings clearly demonstrate that feeding infants breakfast in school at a quite modest cost less than$ 1 a day has positive effects on their educational attainment, Weitzman told the New York Times at the time.

Republicans spent the Obama administration mocking Michelle Obamas campaign to improve school meals; physicians fear that lobbying groups like the School Nutrition Association, which campaigns for lowered nutritional standards in childrens meals, will have its style in a Trump administration. Funding for the National School Lunch Program( NSLP) is not addressed in the Trump budget, which is not exhaustive, but the US Department of Agriculture( USDA ), which administers the program and other childhood nutrition initiatives, will have to induce cuts somewhere of the departments hunger alleviation initiatives, only the supplemental nutritional assistance program is guaranteed funding in the Trump budget.

The connection between childhood nutrition and hard educational metrics such as attendance and test performance has been documented repeatedly, by universities as well as government agencies including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But Weitzman and the other researchers who worked on the Boston study demonstrated explicitly that federally money nutrition programs improve academic performance. That they help to alleviate poverty as well is simply a bonus.

Children qualify for federally subsidized school meals if their familys income is at or below 130% of the federal poverty line, or $31,950 for a family of four. In rural Tennessee, where the cost of living is the lowest in the US according to the Economic Policy Institute, that household would still need $49,767 to stay solvent.

While Mulvaney was immediately denounced for heartlessness, the South Carolina Republican also presents a great disrespect to what science has to contribute to childrens performance in school, Weitzman told the Guardian, which is the work of children and the foundation of society.

The USDA estimated in 2015 that the 6.4 million children lives in households that were food-insecure, meaning that the households sometimes did not have access to enough food for an active, healthy life for all household members. Households with children were food-insecure at a rate of 16.6%, higher than the national average. The Trump administration proposes deep cuts to the USDA, which administers nutritional assistance programs.

Read more: www.theguardian.com

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *